首页> 外文OA文献 >The effects of the Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) mobilisation in the lumbar flexion range of asymptomatic subjects as measured by the Zebris CMS20 3-D motion analysis system
【2h】

The effects of the Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) mobilisation in the lumbar flexion range of asymptomatic subjects as measured by the Zebris CMS20 3-D motion analysis system

机译:通过Zebris Cms20 3-D运动分析系统测量的mulligan持续自然apophyseal Glide(sNaG)动员在无症状受试者的腰部屈曲范围内的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. Mulligan's mobilisation techniques are thought to increase the range of movement (ROM) in patients with low back pain. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the application of the Mulligan's Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) technique on lumbar flexion ROM. The secondary aim was to measure the intra- and inter-day reliability of lumbar ROM employing the same procedure. Methods. 49 asymptomatic volunteers participated in this double-blinded study. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either SNAG mobilisation (n = 25), or a sham mobilisation (n = 24). The SNAG technique was applied at the L3 and L4 spinal levels with active flexion in sitting by an experienced manual therapist. Three sets of 10 repetitions at each of the two spinal levels were performed. The sham mobilisation was similar to the SNAG but did not apply the appropriate direction or force. Lumbar ROM was measured by a three dimensional electronic goniometer (Zebris CMS20), before and after each technique. For the reliability, five measurements in two different days (one week apart) were performed in 20 healthy subjects. Results. When both interventions were compared, independent t tests yielded no statistically significant results in ROM between groups (p = 0.673). Furthermore no significant within group differences were observed: SNAG (p = 0.842), sham (p = 0.169). Intra- and inter-day reliability of flexion measurements was high (ICC1,1 > 0.82, SEM <4.0°, SDD
机译:背景。人们认为Mulligan的动员技术可增加下腰痛患者的运动范围(ROM)。这项研究的主要目的是研究Mulligan的可持续天然骨po滑翔(SNAG)技术在腰屈ROM上的应用。第二个目的是使用相同的方法来测量腰椎ROM的日内和日间可靠性。方法。 49名无症状志愿者参加了这项双盲研究。随机分配受试者接受SNAG动员(n = 25)或假动员(n = 24)。 SNAG技术由经验丰富的手动治疗师在L3和L4脊柱水平应用,并在坐姿中主动弯曲。在两个脊髓水平中的每一个水平上进行三组,每组10次重复。伪装动员与SNAG类似,但未施加适当的方向或力量。在每种技术之前和之后,通过三维电子测角仪(Zebris CMS20)测量腰椎ROM。为了提高可靠性,在20位健康受试者的两天内(相隔一周)进行了五次测量。结果。当将两种干预措施进行比较时,独立的t检验在两组之间的ROM中没有统计学上的显着结果(p = 0.673)。此外,没有观察到组内差异显着:SNAG(p = 0.842),假(p = 0.169)。日间和日间屈曲测量的可靠性很高(ICC1,1> 0.82,SEM <4.0°,SDD

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号